I'm using a sequenced called from my main sequence, and it has a handful of steps. I call this sequence in a new thread. There is a wait statement "Wait for ch B" to rejoin its thread to the main sequence.
My issue is, when one of the steps inside the sequence fails, the failure cause for the sequence is the wait statement's name, "Wait for ch B", instead of the step that actually failed.
Any thoughts on how to fix?